Legacy Code: The Silent Growth Killer (And What You Can Do About It)

Unsupported VB6, Delphi, and Classic ASP apps quietly drain budgets, scare away talent, and put your business at risk—here’s how to tackle legacy code and reclaim growth.

Legacy Code: The Silent Growth Killer (And What You Can Do About It)
Photo by Ugi K. / Unsplash

How unsupported VB6, Delphi, and Classic ASP apps quietly drain budgets, scare away talent, and put your business at risk—plus a modernization game‑plan that works.


1  |  What exactly is “legacy code”?

Any application that depends on tooling, libraries, or operating systems no longer under mainstream support falls into the legacy bucket. In the SMB and mid‑market space that usually means:

  • Visual Basic 6 desktop clients
  • Delphi 7 / XE line‑of‑business apps
  • Classic ASP intranet portals
  • COM/ActiveX “data‑service” DLLs glued together with ADO and Crystal Reports
  • Early .NET Framework (< 4.7), PHP 5.x, and monolithic Java EE stacks

These systems still run, but every month they do so the operational, security, and opportunity costs rise.


2  |  Why keeping legacy code hurts more than you think

Hidden cost Why it matters
Downtime Average IT outages now erase $5,600 per minute for SMBs; bigger firms see $14 k+ /minute (Systech MSP).
Security & compliance fines Unsupported runtimes can’t meet modern frameworks like GDPR, PCI‑DSS or HIPAA—fines can dwarf the original Dev budget (Polcode).
Developer turnover 58 % of senior engineers say they’d quit over “embarrassing” legacy stacks (Storyblok). Replacing a senior dev can cost 50–250 % of salary.
Opportunity cost 80 % of global IT budgets are still swallowed maintaining legacy systems instead of funding new features (RecordPoint).

The result? Slower feature delivery, stalled digital initiatives, and a talent drain that compounds technical debt.


3  |  The market momentum is unmistakable

Analysts put the application‑modernisation services market at $17.8 billion in 2023, on track to hit $52.5 billion by 2030 (16.7 % CAGR) (Grand View Research). Enterprises are moving first, but SMBs are next—before the talent pool for niche tools finally evaporates.


4  |  “What about that big scary rewrite?” – Modernisation myths debunked

Myth Reality
“We’ll have to freeze new features for years.” Phased migrations let old and new run side‑by‑side; blue/green cut‑overs avoid big‑bang risks.
“Rewrite from scratch is the only way.” Tool‑assisted translation + targeted hand‑refactors routinely automate 70–90 % of UI and data‑access code while preserving business logic.
“Our codebase is too big.” Case studies show > 6 million lines of VB6/ASP migrated to C# for Citigroup’s Banamex (Mobilize.Net) and 893 k LOC for Pitney Bowes in five months (TSRI).

5  |  A three‑horizon roadmap you can steal

  1. Assess & quantify
    Automated scans map dependencies, COM interfaces, and database touch‑points in days.
  2. Pilot & validate
    Pick one workflow, automate the translation, hand‑refactor tricky bits, and run dual‑run tests.
  3. Iterate & harden
    Sprint through remaining modules; bake in DevSecOps, CI/CD, and cloud‑native infra along the way.
Automation sweet‑spot: expect 70–90 % of forms, CRUD logic, and data‑access to convert automatically; custom controls, reporting, and embedded business rules still need expert hands.

6  |  Questions to ask any modernisation partner

  1. How do you verify functional equivalence?
  2. What percentage of code do you automate vs. hand‑rewrite—and how is that measured?
  3. How will you secure the new stack (least‑privilege, secrets management, SBOM)?
  4. Can you show live references in our industry or of similar size?
  5. What’s the rollback or dual‑run plan to guarantee zero downtime?

Bring this checklist to your next vendor call; the answers separate tool‑vendors from outcome‑partners.


7  |  Key takeaways

  • Legacy systems aren’t just “old”—they’re an active drag on revenue, security posture, and talent retention.
  • The business case for migration is no longer theoretical; market data and case studies prove the ROI.
  • With modern tooling, most migrations are evolutions, not revolutions—high automation plus targeted refactors.
  • A structured roadmap and the right partner turn “scary rewrite” into a predictable, ROI‑positive project.

Next step: Curious what your own automation percentage might look like? Contact us to get a tailored risk‑and‑ROI report in five business days.